Tag: Election2016

Bernie’s Nomination Debacle

Bernie’s Nomination Debacle

Bernie Sanders cannot win the Democratic Party’s Presidential nomination without working some behind the scenes magic.  But even if he were to swing enough Superdelegates to his side to pass Clinton, wouldn’t he be doing what he claims to hate?  His campaign runs on the notion that he will fix the ‘rigged’ political system.  But using superdelegates to win would be using the ‘rigged’ system he claims to hate. (Which I truly believe he does hate)  I watched his campaign manager, Jeff Weaver, on CNN today speak with Jake Tapper.  He was very tense during the interview and seemed to weave his way away from what Tapper was trying to address.

BUT LET’S RECAP FIRST

Currently, Hillary Clinton has 1,812 PLEDGED delegates to Sanders’ 1,521.  That’s a huge lead in of itself, considering that there are only so many votes left for the taking.  Now, most people know that Clinton and Sanders will more than likely split these remaining votes with one (probably Clinton) getting a little more than the other.  But for the purpose, let’s say Sanders gets most of the delegates.  Even then, he’d be short of the 2,383 needed to win the nomination outright.[1]

But let’s get back to reality now.  Sanders, in his perfect world, may grab 60% of these votes, which would leave Clinton with 40% and a total of that exceeds Sanders’, which would still give her the popular vote by the way.  Both would be short but we haven’t even scratched the surface of the Superdelegates.  And before anyone tries to scream at me and bring up the notion that Superdelegates are a trick by party leaders to control who wins the election… you’re absolutely right.  The Democratic Party is corrupt and uses flimsy rules to get the nominee that their party leaders’ (people they believe actually know what they’re talking about) believe to be the right candidate for their party’s interests.

HOWEVER

This is not the GOVERNMENT being corrupt.  This is a PARTY being corrupt and the only people you can blame for continued party corruption are the leaders and members within that party (which means YOU if you’re a registered Democrat.)  People have this ridiculous viewpoint that we, the people, are only allowed to vote for the Republican Asshole or the Democrat Asshole.  This is where we are at fault.  We can, at any time (election years) end the reign of either of the 2 big parties by simply ignoring them.  We continuously get angry about how the wrong people are in power, we forget that we put them in power.  If you don’t want your candidate to bend at the whim of the democrats or republicans, don’t vote for a democrat or a republican.  Find your guy or gal and run them independent.  Yes, it is hard because of the money that these parties have but all it takes is one big upset to set off a chain-reaction.  You have to work hard to make change.  Sooner or later, the party leaders will step off their thrones, take a look around and adapt to what the people want.  For now, though, the system is what it is because they can make it whatever they want.  It’s a party, not a governing body.  For example, Democrats allowing Independents to vote is completely up to them and if they say no, then it’s no.  It’s not corruption, it’s keeping your party closed to members only.

BACK TO BERNIE

So, including these Superdelegates in the mix, Clinton wins the nomination handedly.  What Jeff Weaver was trying to articulate today on CNN was that Superdelegates aren’t bound votes and can switch sides all the way up to the convention in July.  He’s right about this but at a risky price.  Yes, Sanders can still do some work to flip Superdelegates but he can’t do anything to change the popular vote.  Hillary Clinton has won almost 13 million votes to date compared to Sanders’ 10 million.  There is about a 3 million vote difference between the two of them, so even before you claim voter tampering, go ahead and add a couple hundred thousand votes to Sanders’ score and he still falls well short.[2]  For all of the hoorah and chanting Sanders has voiced (to his credit, extremely well) he still has not convinced the voters, the people he so dearly wants to represent, that he’s the right choice.

So we’re at the point now where Bernie can do 1 of 2 things. He can…

1: Accept the Peoples’ wishes, bow out and throw his support behind Clinton to try and beat the Devil incarnate himself, Donald Trump.

OR…

2: Stay in the race, wine and dine Superdelegates and convince enough of them to switch to his side before the convention begins in July.

BUT

If he goes for option 2, then, like I stated at the beginning; isn’t he doing what he hates?  Bernie isn’t “Politics as usual” but doing this would be just that.  He’d essentially be stealing the election from the people.  He would be the party leaders’ new “Golden Ticket” into the White House and slip past Clinton using the votes of Superdelegates who, everyone knows, do not represent the views of the people.  It really comes down to what Bernie wants more.  If he truly wants to bring down and fix a corrupt party, he should bow out and fight WITH the people to ensure that the next election is not won off of flimsy rules and corrupt party leaders.  If he wants to be President more, he should stay in, bend to the will of the party leaders and steal the election away from Hillary Clinton and, in a sense, the majority of the Democratic Party voters who chose Clinton.

I hope he goes with option 1.  As much as I despise Hillary Clinton; fixing the party system is WAY more important than making sure Clinton stays out of the White House.  Bernie’s passion and his ability to arouse the passion of the people is essential in getting the party system fixed and ensuring that the voting returns to the people and our elected officials bend to our whim, not some rich schmucks who declared themselves “Party Leaders”.

*And again, do your research on other parties.  Gary Johnson was just nominated as the Libertarian candidate.  He’s much better than either Clinton or Trump, in my unprofessional opinion.  We don’t have to choose Democrat or Republican if there’s a better choice out there.*

[1] http://www.270towin.com/2016-democratic-nomination/

 

[2] http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/democratic_vote_count.html

 

Nobody to Blame but yourself, New Yorkers

Nobody to Blame but yourself, New Yorkers

If you couldn’t vote today, don’t blame the ‘System’, blame yourself

*DISCLAIMER*  This may seem very Anti-Bernie, but believe me, it’s not.  This is more about the voters than Senator Sanders.  Also, I am not Pro-Trump as some people may infer from this article.  I have decided once again to support 3rd Party Candidate Gary Johnson since I agree with his positions and despise the Two-Party system.

So I haven’t been posting lately.  I’ve been sitting and waiting to see how things played out.  But today is NY Primary day and, being a New Yorker, I thought I needed to respond to the craziness I’ve been seeing on Social Media today.  All throughout the day, people have been complaining about how they could not vote for Bernie Sanders or Donald Trump for one of 2 reasons:

1.)    They are an Independent who did not register with either the Democratic or Republican Party.

2.)    They are a college student who failed to secure an absentee ballot and send it in by March 25th.

Now I could also not vote today since I am an Independent but I knew that from the beginning.  I sent out a few tweets earlier this month urging people to double-check whether or not they would be able to vote.  But many people still did not know this information and have begun flooding lines and causing an uproar on Twitter whenever they are denied access.  It’s honestly the craziest thing to me.  I would have to say that a majority of the people who are being denied the right to vote today are young Sanders’ voters because of one of the two reasons mentioned above.  And it really strikes me because these are the people who are trying to start this ‘Political Revolution’ yet they have no clue how the process they are trying to change works. (How can you hate something you don’t even understand?)  Yes, it’s confusing and yes, it’s probably corrupt also; but that doesn’t mean you get to do what you want just because you think you’re doing the right thing.

The other thing that sticks is the irony in all of this.  For the past two weeks, Donald Trump’s kids have been getting hammered by Sanders’ supporters because they did not register in time to vote for their dad.  People have been insulting them for not knowing the process that, as it turns out, they do not know themselves.  It’s very easy to land yourself on the short end of the stick when you ridicule someone for something.

The final thing that bothers me is that the people who can’t vote today are trying to blame the system.  The only person you can blame for not being able to vote is yourself.  You didn’t take the time to learn the process and now you’re paying the price for it.  When Hillary wins this thing today and essentially locks up the nomination, it’ll be because of the failure of the youth vote.  And of course, Sanders will come out and disavow the process for being unfair but New York has had a closed primary for a while now.  In 2000, the New York Times released an article in which they complained about the ‘unfair’ process and pleaded for people to call then Gov. Pataki to change the rules.[1]   So people can’t say that this is something that just confused them.  Even Bernie Sanders’ campaign team knew about the process and urged people to register through their website and social media profiles.[2]  But I guess people were too busy to take 2 seconds to check the voting rules.  I did it today to see just how hard it was.  All I did was type in ‘NY Absentee Ballot’ in Google and hit the first link.  It brought me to the NY State Board of Elections where I found all of the information I needed.[3]  It took about 1 minute but I also don’t type very fast.

It’s time to take responsibility for your mistakes.  If your guy/gal does not happen to win today, don’t blame a rigged system.  We’ve had plenty of time to learn how it works.  Taking the time out to learn it is all it takes.  That’s why I will always stress researching on your own rather than relying on the media, your candidate or your friends and family to tell you how the voting process in your respective state works.

[1] http://www.nytimes.com/2000/01/03/opinion/new-york-s-closed-primary.html

 

[2] https://vote.berniesanders.com/ny

 

[3] http://www.elections.ny.gov/VotingDeadlines.html

 

 

Stop with the Fake Trump “Facts”/Memes

Stop with the Fake Trump “Facts”/Memes

Understanding Donald Trump Supporters

Happy Super Tuesday everybody.

Over the past several months, we’ve witnessed as time and time again, Donald Trump says whatever he wants and his lead isn’t affected.  Better yet, he manages to somehow grow an even larger lead after he is publicly attacked by the media, social media and the rest of the country.  He’s called Mexicans “rapists”, called for a ban on Muslims and even attempted to seem a little confused on who David Duke is (Former Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan).  And each and every time, he is called out for it by the media in the harshest of ways.  When we see this media backlash, we, as millennials, rush to our Twitter and Facebook accounts hoping to share the memes that are sure to be made about how bad Trump is.  And, I’ve got to be honest; we do a really good job of humiliating this man.  In the comments section, there isn’t much support found for Trump as it is mostly people doubling down on their hatred for the bigot.  Then, we wait.  We wait for the seemingly inevitable drop in his support.  But instead, as he has proven countless times in this election season, he is unfazed by the attacks.  Rather than his downfall, we get breaking news from CNN that his lead has grown an extra 2 or 3 points.

And the big question that no one seems to be able to understand is… HOW?

Since no one seems to know how, I’ll take a crack at it.  The simplest explanation I can come up with is this; Trump supporters do not give a crap about all of the bad things the media or anyone making up memes in their dorm room has to say about him.  Trump, regardless of what the media might tell you, is an extremely gifted politician.  Early on in this race, from his very first interview where he labeled Mexicans as “rapists and criminals” he was pandering towards a very specific group of people.  That group is the Silent Majority.  This is a large number of people in the U.S., particularly the white, evangelistic voters of the southern states.  Everything that Trump has done has basically been done for them, in my opinion.

Trump’s entire platform revolves around this idea of “Make America Great Again”.  For the Silent Majority, anything else he says is basically filler.  They hear this message and are immediately flooded with memories of a U.S. pre-Obama.  And while we may not see that America as “great”; they do and that’s all that matters.  They’re reminded of the times when America didn’t act on social issues quickly, when Presidents spoke their mind and didn’t give in to political correctness and when America wasn’t trailing China in certain economic categories.  Now, not all of this is because of Obama but a lot of these concerns have been raised under his administration.  For the Silent Majority, Trump is someone who understands their ideals and wants to bring them out of the shadows and back into the foreground.  Under President Obama, the Silent Majority was widely ignored as Obama dealt with other issues.  This group wasn’t a priority to him and it’s showing in this election season.  They are out in force to find their perfect candidate.  And Trump is feeding them all of the attention that they want and they are eating it up and backing him with unheard of loyalty.

As far as the media and memes are concerned, there’s an explanation for that as well.  The Silent Majority is a group that has been ridiculed and bashed by the media in recent years (8 or so).  So everything that the media puts on Trump is another way of trying to put them down and, instead of losing him support, it actually inspires his supporters even more to fight back against the establishment.  And his supporters are typically older white men and women so either they don’t see the memes made by millennials or they just don’t care about our opinion since they dislike us as much as the media.  They think that we’re making America weak with our political correctness, Starbucks and participation trophies.

Donald Trump is more than likely going to be the nominee at this point in the race.  He doesn’t just have the Silent Majority’s votes either.  If you don’t want to see him in the White House in 2017, here are a couple things to consider:

1.)    Mass Media/GOP Establishment: Stop posting attacks and rumors about Trump

–          Every time you attack Trump you give him a reason to sidetrack.  He gets as much time as he wants to address the attack and avoid talking about actual issues.  I don’t think he’s talked about a single issue since he announced he was running for President.  Get him to talk about issues so we can see how informed he actually is.  Enough with the 24/7 airtime too.

2.)    Social Media: Stop harassing Trump supporters with hate-filled memes and comments

–          Every time you attack his supporters for their “low intelligence” or “racism” you fuel them even more.  You give them the motivation to go out there and convert people to the Trump Train.  And let’s be real, you’re not doing much to swing votes to your candidate. (And no, sharing memes about Bernie Sanders isn’t enough)

 

We can only blame ourselves if Donald Trump is elected President in November.

History is Repeating Itself

History is Repeating Itself

Young America is Mimicking (albeit less radically) the Actions of Young America circa Vietnam

Being a history major in college allowed me to track all of the times in which history repeated itself.  You find that it doesn’t matter how educated the man or group was; they always blindly fell down the same path as their predecessors.  Take Napoleon and Hitler’s marches into Russia as an example.[1][2]

America is as guilty of these instances as any other nation.  Today, I find us increasingly in danger of falling into a similar cycle that we have already experienced.  And it is my age group that is a part of this and also will be the group that feels its effects.  We are following the blueprint of young Americans during the late ‘60s and ‘70s.  The situations are eerily similar.  And while the ‘60s and ‘70s are widely considered decades of great social justices, they are also seen as some of the most tumultuous times this nation has ever seen in regards to racial issues and government disapproval.  We are becoming just as disillusioned with our current situation as young Americans were during ‘Nam.

War and Government that no one wants:

Back in the ‘60s, the youth was disillusioned with the Vietnam War.  They protested the United States’ involvement and accused soldiers of the genocide of young, innocent Vietnamese people.  Some protests turned deadly (Kent State) and caused the people to feel even more disconnect with their government.  When things calmed down a little, they were struck with more reason to resent the government when President Nixon’s Watergate scandal came to light.  It also did not help the cause when Ford pardoned Nixon of any wrongdoing.[3]  They were living in an era of complete governmental and military turmoil.

Today, we find ourselves in a uniquely similar position.  Much of the public is through with the Middle East.  Iraq, Syria, Libya and Afghanistan have drained us of all our fighting spirit.  We continually fight for something that we do not understand or believe in.  Our method of protesting is through social media with memes and long posts where we rip the government and all of the “Hawks” inside of it a new one (even if we have no relevant information or sources).  And anyone who tries to argue with us gets a full taste of our anger through multiple comments, videos, Jordan meme faces, etc.  We’ve also had to deal with a rash of scandals including General Petraeus and the on-going Hillary Clinton spectacle.  Because of this, we have either backed away from the government completely or latched ourselves on to people who we believe oppose D.C. (Sanders and Trump).

Social Issues Galore:

During the Vietnam War, the Supreme Court was extremely active.  Every social issue of the time was up for grabs; Free Speech, Privacy Issues, Criminal Rights, etc.  Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) was a case that involved the rights of students to protest the war. They wore black arm bands to voice their disapproval.[4]  Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) dealt with privacy.  There were also a slew of cases that fought for the rights of the accused.  These included Miranda v. Arizona (1966), Mapp v. Ohio (1960) and Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) which dealt with issues like self-incrimination, illegally obtained evidence and the right to counsel.[5]  Finally, there was the issue in Roe v. Wade (1973) which gave women the right to get an abortion.  Regardless of the issues, the era was filled with rapidly changing social issues which the youth responded to.  They were in favor of such decisions such as Roe V. Wade but very much disapproved of the way in which issues like homosexuality (Stonewall Riots) were handled.[6]  The point is that this era of young Americans was hit with an absurd amount of change in a short amount of time.[7]

The same can be said for today’s youth.  We’ve had to endure crucial social issues that include health, gay marriage and immigration in a short span of time.  For some, our bleeding support can clearly be seen in cases such as Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) which guaranteed same-sex marriage under the Constitution.[8]  Somewhat related to that is the way in which Transgender people are beginning to fight for their rights and the legion of support they are receiving from the youth.[9]  Another issue which has been lauded by the youth is the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) which gives all Americans, regardless of income, the right to affordable health care.[10]  Both of these issues received strong support from people my age because it is the belief of this generation that same-sex marriage and health care are both obvious rights of the people.  We also show our disapproval with the outcomes of certain immigration issues.  The majority of this generation believes that immigration and amnesty should be protected based on the belief that we are a country of immigrants.  Also, our past history of how we became America (being welcomed by the Native Americans) should influence how we act as a nation towards new immigrants.  That is why many were angered with the decision in Arizona v. United States (2012).  While striking down 3 of the immigration laws passed by the Arizona legislature, the Supreme Court still upheld the law that allowed law enforcement to request legal status papers from anyone.  People felt that this was a grossly discriminatory law that allowed police to unconstitutionally harass anyone they wanted to.[11]  Regardless, this is just the tip of the iceberg of the social issues faced with both generations.  The amount that has been thrown at us and our Vietnam era predecessors is absurd however.  We have had to respond to a variety of different, impactful issues at a young age.

The “Racism is Over” Issue:

When the Civil Rights Act was signed into law, many people believed that racism was finally over and that things could finally get started.  Martin Luther King Jr. himself called it nothing short of a, “second emancipation”.[12] However, they failed to realize that signing a paper didn’t turn racists into non-racists.  All over the country, young black men and women were still being oppressed by radical white supremacists.  This led to the Black Panther Party which looked to protect African-Americans as well as keep the fight for their rights alive.  However, this also led some black people to become distant and believe that all white people were racists.  While it was a milestone in race relations, the Civil Rights Act can be seen as a cause for the continued divide between the races.

When President Barack Obama was sworn into office in 2009, people finally believed that racism was over.  The country (still a white majority) managed to elect a young, black senator from Illinois to the highest position in the land.  Once again, it led people to feel that racism had been solved and we were all going to live united.  However, swearing a black man into the Oval Office did not cure people of their racist tendencies like we believed it did.  Still, young black men and women are oppressed daily.  White people tend to turn to the fact that the President is black to defend their position.  And they’re partially right; we have come a long, long way with our race relations but we’re not close to being done. (F.Y.I. arguing that, “Nothing has changed”, makes you look unintelligent, oblivious of obvious history and causes MLK to roll over in his grave, so stop it)  Just because the President is black doesn’t mean all black people are safe from racial oppression; just he is because of his status. (And he’s a target occasionally too)  With our super-sensitive society today, many people tend to over-react at some issues.  The Black Lives Matter movement was formed to bring light to racial discrimination, particularly with law enforcement.  This has caused a major divide between the races.

Our naïve belief that 2 events “solved racism” has caused whites and blacks to remain bitter and cautious towards each other.

Pentagon Papers v. Edward Snowden:

In 1967, Daniel Ellsberg leaked hundreds of secret Vietnam War documents to the New York Times and Washington Post.  The documents were extremely controversial and made the military’s actions in Vietnam open for public view.  The instance severely discredited the military and US government in the eyes of the public, especially the younger citizens.  To them, this was yet another attempt by the government to withhold information from them and to operate behind closed doors despite their claims of transparency.  The leak caused an uproar about how the issue should be handled and what, if anything, should happen to Ellsberg.  The youth rallied around him because they believed what he did was patriotic.[13]

In 2013, Edward Snowden leaked thousands of documents to “The Guardian” regarding the espionage tactics and targets of the US, Canada, Australia and UK.  The leak extremely weakened the US’ credibility and reputation among world leaders.  It also allowed other nations, particularly China and Russia, to have a first-hand look into the US’ cyber methods.  The leak caused Snowden to flee the US in fear of being convicted of treason.  Even though he weakened the US’ defenses, Snowden is still widely viewed as a hero and patriot for lifting the curtain from the secret world of the US government.[14]

1976 Presidential Election v. 2016 Presidential Election:

In 1976, incumbent (although never elected) Gerald Ford was up against Georgia governor Jimmy Carter for President of the United States.  Following Watergate, Vietnam and other damaging issues, the Ford Administration was under extreme scrutiny.  His approval was so bad, in fact, that he faced stiff competition in the Republican Primaries; this is very unusual for incumbents (he narrowly beat out Ronald Reagan).  The people were fed up with the lies and betrayal of the government and wanted to elect someone who was considered an outsider (sound familiar?).  Jimmy Carter was an unknown governor from Georgia who rose quickly because of his “outsider” status.  He ran on the promise that he would stray away from typical D.C. politics and be more for the people.  According to CBS interviews in 1976, Carter secured more of the youth vote.  This can be attributed to the idea that Carter wasn’t an establishment candidate and Ford was a part of the Nixon Administration during Watergate.  There was no trust in Ford, especially after he pardoned Nixon for his actions involving Watergate.  It rubbed people the wrong way and Carter narrowly defeated Ford in November for the presidency.[15]

Today, we find ourselves in the midst of a similar situation.  President Obama’s time is nearly up and, across all parties, the message is clear; elect someone outside of D.C.  This election season has seen plenty of “outsider” candidates ranging from Carly Fiorina to Ben Carson.  However, the two that have stuck are Republican Fear Monger Donald Trump and Democratic Socialist Bernie Sanders.  Both couldn’t be farther apart on their issues but they both bring the same outsider presence that young voters (and voters in general) are looking for.  Young people love Bernie Sanders because he is igniting a political revolution which intends to bring down corruption in Wall Street and D.C.[16]  Young people love Donald Trump because he speaks his mind and tells it how it is.  He doesn’t “softball” any of his comments and isn’t afraid to offend someone which people view as genuine.[17]

Summary:

We have repeated many of the same things that Americans, in general, did during the ‘60s and ‘70s.  We have not been as radical as they were back then but the blueprint is pretty similar.  It’s scary because, even with all of this knowledge of that period, we seem to be playing it by the book.  It’s good for us to be passionate about certain things but we also need to be mindful of our history so we don’t keep repeating the ‘60s and ‘70s, which were some of the most tumultuous times this nation has ever seen.

And we need to slow down and take a real good look at the nation we are forming.  Every day that someone our age, regardless of race, is on social media slamming a Beyoncé performance being anti-cop or blaming all white people for a cop killing a young black man, we divide ourselves even further.  We need to start taking responsibility for our actions on Twitter and Facebook and find a way to unite our nation rather than divide it.  So no more stupid posts about how the Confederate Flag, “has special heritage within the south”; that flag is racist.  Make the sacrifice for the good of the nation you claim to love so much and get rid of it.  And no more stupid videos of young black people in “white face” mimicking white frat guys.  Yeah, they’re tools but by doing that, you’re showing you’re no better than white racists.  And not white racists today; extremely white racists at the turn of the century who believed Eugenics was the future of the world.  Think about it.  It’s posts like these two that drive up 100k comments and shares of pure hate and division.  We’re better than this.

[1] http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/defeat/attack-russia.htm

[2] http://www.history.com/news/napoleons-disastrous-invasion-of-russia-200-years-ago

[3] http://www.historyplace.com/speeches/ford.htm

[4] http://www.firstamendmentschools.org/freedoms/case.aspx?id=404

[5] http://www.civilrights.org/judiciary/supreme-court/key-cases.html

[6] http://www.civilrights.org/archives/2009/06/449-stonewall.html

[7] http://www.ushistory.org/us/57d.asp

[8] https://www.oyez.org/cases/2014/14-556

[9] http://news.wgcu.org/post/internet-helps-transgender-youth-come-out

[10] http://obamacarefacts.com/obamacare-facts/

[11] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/25/arizona-immigration-law-ruling_n_1614067.html

[12] http://www.history.com/topics/black-history/civil-rights-act

[13] http://www.history.com/topics/vietnam-war/pentagon-papers

[14] http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jun/14/edward-snowden-hero-government-scare-tactics

[15] http://www.gallup.com/poll/9460/election-polls-vote-groups-19761980.aspx

[16] http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/09/why-young-people-like-bernie-sanders/

[17] https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/12/12/the-four-basic-reasons-that-explain-why-donald-trump-actually-is-so-popular/

 

Who is Gary Johnson?

Who is Gary Johnson?

Widening the field: Libertarian Candidate

“Be Libertarian with me”.  This is the slogan that candidate Gary Johnson is running for President of the United States with.  Who, exactly, is Gary Johnson?  It’s completely understandable if you have no idea who this man is.  Besides not receiving any media time from CNN, Fox News or anyone else for that matter since announcing his candidacy, Johnson also doesn’t belong to either the Democratic or Republican Parties. It’s time you learned about some of the other options, starting with Gary Johnson.

Here’s a short summary of the candidate.  As a college student, Johnson began a door to door handyman business that helped him pay for his tuition.  Eventually, he turned this into a million dollar organization that employed over a thousand workers.  Being a businessman, Johnson claims to take a very fiscally responsible view towards running the country, which would include gutting the government.[1]

After college and his business venture, Johnson was the governor of New Mexico from 1994 until 2003.  There, he was known as one of the most fiscally conservative governors in the nation.  He consistently vetoed any plans to expand the budget and earned the nickname, “Governor Veto”.  He was also known for, “balancing the hell out of his budgets” as GQ put it in their exclusive on him.[2]  In 2012, Johnson invaded the presidential race.  Originally running as a Republican to have a realistic shot in the race, Johnson switched to the Libertarian ticket and ran a third party nomination against President Obama and Mitt Romney.  While only garnering 1% of the total vote, (roughly 1 million voters) Johnson placed 3rd and finished with more votes than any Libertarian candidate in history.[3]

What grabbed the attention of the people was Gary Johnson’s odd approach to Washington and his liberal and conservative policies.  Much like Bernie Sanders this time around, Johnson brought new ideals to the race (albeit less extreme).  Johnson is in favor of a huge slash in the federal budget; over 40% in fact. By that figure, you’d expect him to be a staunch conservative.  However, Johnson is also Pro-Choice and in favor of the legalization of Marijuana and Same-Sex Marriage.  He also believes that personal freedoms need to be respected which goes with his idea of a smaller government.  He supports legislation to prohibit the federal government from spying on personal calls and messages without warrants.[4]

He’s no Bernie Sanders, that’s for sure.  He doesn’t believe college should be free or that Wall Street needs to burn to the ground.  He’s not a “Revolutionary” like Bernie; he’s a self-proclaimed Game Changer.  In a country where we haven’t had a candidate who embodies both sides of the fence, Johnson is the face of pure compromise.  He will be able to deal with both sides of the coin because he can relate to both sides.

Johnson also doesn’t have any media attention because he is running as a 3rd party nominee.  Bernie Sanders can triumph all he wants about not taking a dime from big business but he still benefits from the political engine that is the Democratic Party.  Johnson will never get any traction because he doesn’t take from Wall Street AND he doesn’t benefit from running with a money-hungry party.  He is running a true grassroots campaign; not Cruz, not Sanders, not Trump.  So much so that, in 2012, his campaign credit card was declined at a hotel and he ended up paying for his managers’ rooms himself.[5]

Look, if you’re unsure of who to vote for, I strongly urge you to give this man a look.  Especially for us young voters, he seems to embody a lot of what we are trying to do (for me, at least, that’s true).  He shouldn’t be discarded simply because he can’t afford to run for President. (He’s a millionaire, by the way)  The presidency isn’t supposed to be determined by money; that’s our mistake.  We believe that a candidate with a lot of financial support is reliable.  This is not the case; they are just usually the biggest sell-outs. (I.e. Jeb! and Hillary)  The guy is CEO of a Cannabis company, for crying out loud.  He’s climbed the highest peak of every continent and, by all accounts, is a genuinely honest man.[6]

I feel like I’m getting very biased now so I’m going to stop.

BUT, if you call yourself an “Independent”, it’s probably because you can’t identify with the extreme ideologies of the Democrats and Republicans.  Nowadays, you’re either for amnesty or want a wall built.  You either agree with everything Obama’s done or you wish he would disappear from US History.  These are the qualifications of the 2 parties today.  Why can’t you have opinions that are in the middle?

In a Ted Cruz vs. Hillary Clinton race, no one wins.  Why not take a longer look into Johnson or any other 3rd party nominee and see if they represent what you want in a Commander-in-Chief?  If you don’t feel sure about the main candidates running, why pressure yourself into voting for one of them?  The more attention you give 3rd party nominees, the harder it will be for the media to ignore them.

[1] https://www.garyjohnson2016.com/about.html

[2] http://www.gq.com/story/gary-johnson-republican-candidate-debate-interview

[3] https://www.garyjohnson2016.com/about.html

[4] Ibid

[5] http://www.gq.com/story/gary-johnson-republican-candidate-debate-interview

[6] https://www.garyjohnson2016.com/about.html

Let’s move away from an Archaic Party System

Let’s move away from an Archaic Party System

An Alternative to the Democratic and Republican Parties

When I first became involved in politics, I assumed that I was a Democrat because that’s what my mother is.  But, as I grew older and looked more into it, I realized that I was not always agreeing with what Democrats were saying.  Their Liberal agenda was exhausting and often seemed poorly researched.  They often throw out extremely important issues (immigration, racial issues, economic disparity, etc.) but then have no real substantial or even realistic plan to follow through with their “common sense” policies.  I discovered that the only reason they are more liked by young people and minorities is because they come out firing on the social injustices that many citizens can relate to.  While their morals are in the right place, they don’t normally have realistic ways of accomplishing their goals.  They believe that by calling it “common sense” and highlighting the fact that it concerns minorities, we’re all just going to jump on their backs to the Promised Land.  Well, that isn’t the case anymore.

So then I did the logical thing and switched to the Republican Party.  And at first, I thought maybe I was a conservative.  I do agree with capitalism, for the most part, I oppose generations of families on Welfare and I believe the government is way too large.  Capitalism is competitive and allows for innovation.  Welfare should not be for life and too many people take advantage of it.  And yes, the government is humongous and every day, we allow new ways for them to intrude on our lives.  But then I realized that I also don’t identify as a Conservative.  There are far too many ideologies that I disagree with.

First off, I do think we need Welfare; it helps people who are down on their luck get back on their feet.  But it should be an emergency program like it was intended, not a first option.  Back during the colonial times, Welfare was an embarrassment and men who needed it were publicly humiliated.  This was to limit Welfare and promote the idea of “rolling up your sleeves” and figuring the issue out on your own.  Also, Welfare should have a time limit.  No family should live their entire life on Welfare.  There is no good reason why someone should not be able to find a job and be able to support themselves and their children.  Before my mother was 21 years old, she had 2 kids and was living in a 2 bedroom apartment in the Bronx with my grandparents and uncles.  Desperate, she turned to Welfare to help her get back on her feet and provide for 2 children.  However, she made a promise to herself that this would not last long.  She worked her ass off and found jobs that helped her up.  She managed her finances and made sure she was frugal.  She wasn’t using the welfare money for expensive clothes or cars that she knew she couldn’t afford.  The money was used to get the necessities.  Before she and my father got back together, she was off of Welfare and helping out my grandparents financially.  She has a GED, no college education and still managed to get herself off of Welfare with 2 children.  So for anyone to say they have no choice isn’t trying hard enough.  A wake-up call is what they need.  Something to show them that they need to get their priorities straight; not collect monthly government checks to go out and waste it on junk.  It’s a hard truth and yes; there are always some extreme cases but for the most part, this is true.

I also realized that, unlike many conservatives, I am Pro-Choice and for the legalization of marijuana.  I may not agree with either of the two but it is not my place to decide whether a woman can choose to get an abortion or a stoner can choose to smoke his life away.  That is their choice and no one should be allowed to tell them any differently.  As long as they are not hurting anyone around them, there is really no issue here and it doesn’t involve you anyway.  As a wise man once said, “The whole point of this country is if you want to eat garbage, balloon up to 600 pounds and die of a heart attack at 43, you can! You are free to do so. To me, that’s beautiful.” (Ron SwansonParks and Recreation)  This extends to everyone.

When I realized that I wasn’t liberal or conservative, I kind of freaked out.  But then I decided that this is okay.  It’s liberating to not feel attached to one particular set of ideologies.  So I registered as an Independent which is what a lot of people our age do.  We don’t relate to these two parties anymore.  These people have destroyed the respect and honor that these parties used to represent and have instead turned them into bickering exes who will stop at nothing to see the other’s demise.

What we need to do now is branch out and find new parties to support.  Sadly, the Democratic and Republican parties appear beyond saving.  They will never find a way to work together.  It’s up to us to discover new parties who are concerned about our needs rather than coming up with new ways to scandalize the other side.  It could be the Green Party, Tea Party, Socialist Party, or whatever.  Finding what defines you is more important than succumbing to one of the “Establishment” Parties because you feel you have to.  If enough of us go find our own way, the old parties will either have to adapt or watch their party fizzle away.  And it’s happened before.  The Federalists, Anti-Federalists, Whigs and Democratic-Republicans all watched their power diminish when they refused to move with the times.

YOU just have to get out there and find the party that suits you best.  Do your research because no one else will do it for you.  For me, that was the Libertarian Party.  Libertarians believe in a smaller government, balancing budgets, cutting taxes and gun rights.  However, we also believe in fair immigration policies, pro-choice measures and are also for same-sex marriage.  We understand that times change and that we need to adjust to represent that.  Maybe this is what you believe in too, maybe it isn’t; the point is that unless you go out and find what’s right for you, you’ll continue to feel disillusioned with the government.  The government can seem untrustworthy and dishonest but if you really do your research, you’ll see that there are people that are trying to fix it.

And until we stop conforming to the 2-party system and electing assholes, we’re going to feel the compulsion to keep choosing between Democrats or Republicans.  I’m not an anarchist; I just want to stop watching us complain about the people that WE elect to run our country.  So many people run for President every 4 years but we only seem to notice 2 candidates every November.  Only we can change that.  And REALLY think about it.  Because at the pace we’re going, we’re going to have to choose between Hillary Clinton and Ted Cruz for President of the United States…

Why the Iowa Caucus shouldn’t influence your vote

Why the Iowa Caucus shouldn’t influence your vote

Don’t let one state in Midwestern America decide who you vote for

The Iowa Caucus is finally over.  Ted Cruz pulled out an impressive win over Donald Trump, who came very close to falling to 3rd place after an unexpected Marco Rubio surge.  On the Democrat side, Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders virtually tied; showcasing the fact that this will be a tight race for the nomination.

Still, the Iowa Caucus shouldn’t influence your vote.  In the grand scheme of things, the caucus just served as a Black Monday for a lot of the candidates who realized they had no real shot at the their party’s nomination. (Black Monday is the Monday following the last week of the regular season in the NFL when a lot of coaches are typically fired)  The people of Iowa don’t necessarily share the same values and opinions on how this country should be run.

Iowa, as a state, is 87.1% white, compared to 62.1% in the nation.  They are also farmers and “country folk” (no disrespect) more than anything else.  So to take the numbers you see on CNN at face value would be detrimental.  In a state where only 3.4% of the population is black and 5.6% are Hispanic, there is no way to get a good consensus of who the country actually believes is right for the presidency. [1]

I respect Iowa and everything they stand for but the obsession we have with the Caucus is absurd.  They are one small state in this Nation and the weight of the election should not be placed in their hands.  So if you voted for Marco Rubio or Donald Trump or whomever, don’t let the fact that they lost persuade you to have to vote for someone else.  Keep doing your research and find the candidate who represents your views and opinions.  Don’t feel like you have to vote for who we’re told to vote for.  I voted for Gary Johnson in 2012 and I’ll probably vote for him again this election.  Don’t get pressured into voting mainstream.

[1] http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/19000.html

 

Marco Rubio Making Strides in Iowa

With most of the votes tallied in the Iowa Caucus, it is becoming more and more clear which candidates have staying power.  On the Democratic side, Clinton and Sanders are polling neck and neck with Clinton having the slight advantage as of now.  With the Republicans, three men are splitting the votes right now.  Cruz, Trump and Rubio in that order are polling at 28, 25 and 22 percent respectively.  As for the rest of the candidates, let’s just say we’ll hopefully start to see some of them drop out of the race for our sake.

And what does it all mean? Absolutely nothing.  The Iowa Caucus is more of a campaign killer than it is a campaign helper.  It really just helps to show us who doesn’t have staying power in the race.  And recently, Iowa has been bad at picking the nominees, especially on the Republican side.  Back in 2012, Rick Santorum won the Iowa Caucus in surprise fashion over Mitt Romney.  But Romney ended up getting the nomination when it was all said and done.

As for our votes, it is clear that Iowa City and Ames will be crucial to see where we stand with our candidates.  That is because those two cities house both the University of Iowa and Iowa State University.  Knowing what candidate they choose will be a good barometer of who young people truly see as their candidate in the respective parties.

As for the Caucus, it is clear there is more to come because the polls are changing as I write. Sanders is catching up to Clinton and, whether or not he wins, has shown that the people believe in the message he is promoting.  More to come.

Feel the “Bern”: From One Young Voter to Another

Feel the “Bern”: From One Young Voter to Another

#Election2016

Getting past the 3 M’s… Mud, Media and Misinformation

Election season is upon us and once again we find ourselves embroiled in Republican and Democratic Party debates.  Unlike last election, however, this time around we have to pick between two unproven leaders.  And whatever they may tell you to get your vote, none of them have any idea of what they’re getting into.  Being President of the United States instantly makes you the most powerful person in the world.  You are endowed with the greatest military the world has ever known, an annual GDP of over $17 TRILLION[1], a nuclear arsenal with the capability of destroying all life on Earth, not to mention a deficit that amounts to over $17 Trillion as well.[2]  For anyone to say they have the “experience” to handle all of this is either; A.) Lying for votes B.) Hiding a rather impressive (and probably illegal) resume from the public or C.) Oblivious of the requirements for President, which is scarier than A.  Regardless, none of the candidates running for office have the experience necessary to run the country.

A lot of people my age seem eager to vote in the upcoming election.  I don’t know what it is, there is just a sense of urgency that if we, as a nation, don’t choose the right person, the country will fall apart completely.  While things may seem bad, I just want to let people know that we have been through worse.  We made it through Nixon, Hoover, Buchanan, etc. and are still standing today.  So don’t place all of your eggs in this one election, we’ll still be around to correct the problem should we elect a poor President in November.

There are assumptions made about voters my age that I would like to address.  One is the assumption that all young voters are Liberals.  This is not true.  I know plenty of people my age that are Conservative and I live in New York.  Being Liberal or Conservative doesn’t define you as a person or voter either. Being Liberal doesn’t make you a radical progressive who wants equality for everything.  And being Conservative doesn’t make you a staunch believer in keeping things the way they are.  Whatever our political views are, most young voters, just like most people in general, are for progress.  The only difference is the speed at which we make that progress.

Another assumption is that we get all of our information from social media.  While a lot of it, regrettably, is through Twitter and Facebook, (74% actually)[3] CNN, Fox News and the other news outlets provide us with tons of information.  At a college campus, there is constantly a TV on with the news and there are always students watching and learning.  I wish more of us would read the paper every now and then or get the perspective from a renowned political scientist or historian, but we live in an era of technology.

The last assumption is that our vote doesn’t matter.  Our vote, particularly those of young voters, is the most important fuel for these candidates’ campaigns.  If it wasn’t important, these politicians wouldn’t be continuously embarrassing themselves to earn our trust and vote.  They portray themselves to be hip and with the times by taking selfies, doing popular dances or keeping up with social media to make themselves seem more relatable to us.  They want us to feel safe and believe that they will be looking out for our best interests.  It’s the same as when a candidate goes to a shooting range and fires off a couple rounds to impress the NRA.  “You can shoot a gun?  You obviously care about gun rights.” Similarly, “Oh, you Dab?  Well you obviously care about our generation.”  So stop telling yourself your vote isn’t important.  We are going to make or break this election for someone.

With that being said, I’d like to talk about each candidate and give my fellow young voters a better sense of what each person brings to the table because with all the mudslinging going around it’s getting hard to tell truth from fiction.  No CNN or Fox News here trying to brainwash you and control your vote.  I’m just a 21 year old trying to help you through all of the mud.  This is not to change your mind, only to put the candidates in the voice of our generation.  If you’re tired of hearing older people tell you who will treat you best, this is worth the read.  Hopefully, this will convince you to go and look up some of these candidates for further evaluation.  I don’t want my views being used because then I am no better than the media or a social media celebrity.

BERNIE SANDERS- DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST (Self-proclaimed youth)

What is there to say about this guy that isn’t already known?  He is the new era in politics even if he may be one of the oldest candidates ever.  But he still embodies that sense of progress and revolution that always seem to drive the younger generations.  He is progressive on every issue and has stated his desire to revamp everything D.C. and turn them upside down.  He plans on hitting Wall Street with everything he’s got.  He’s anti-establishment, like someone else in the race.  But he’s also Anti-Trump.  Look, I get it.  Bernie wants to legalize pot, make school free, health care free, drive the banks away, etc.  He genuinely cares about the people and I believe he would do everything to fix the disparity in the classes.  He would also do his best in stopping corruption at the federal level because he doesn’t stand for it.

BUT this guy, like Trump, seems like a ticking time bomb.  If he’s president, I’m afraid he’ll tackle too many issues too fast and he’ll get shut out.  Congress and the courts won’t want to hear it and he’ll be forced to take executive action which leads to an abuse in power.  It’s one of the things that Obama got too comfortable with towards the end of his term, in my opinion.  Bernie’s got the fire and the path to progression but sometimes it’s way too fast.  And the Socialism thing scares me.  I know he has explained himself numerous times but still, he should know better.  We spent over 40 years fighting the Union of Soviet SOCIALIST Republics (USSR) because we did not believe in their ideologies.  So to throw that word around your campaign so freely is irresponsible in my eyes and one of the major hindrances in his campaign.

Overall, Bernie is a unique candidate and I hope his style and fire rubs off on some of the younger generation.  A less radical person with that personality would be unstoppable in their political career.

HILLARY CLINTON- Democrat (*message deleted from server*)

Hillary Clinton is possibly the scariest and most exciting candidate of them all. (Trump the other) When I think about Hillary, I cringe.  She seems deceitful, unforgiving and mysterious.  Her life has been in the public eye for so long and still she somehow manages to keep secrets.  While it is disturbing, it is equally impressive.  It is impossible to believe a word that comes out of this woman’s mouth.  She has also flip-flopped on a number of issues.  And there is nothing wrong with changing your mind.  However, with Hillary, she makes it appear as if she never flip-flopped and had always had her current views.  Her relationship with President Obama is extremely awkward.  Their friendship is completely based off of his public approval ratings.  She has no problem stabbing him in the back and then supporting him if the numbers support her actions.  Benghazi is obviously scary.  She seems tense every time she is approached with the question randomly.  But then when she is talking before a committee, you can’t help but believe every word she says about it.

It begs to the point that this woman is calculating and extremely persuasive.  And it is hard to tell whether or not that is a good thing.  What works for her is experience.  She was first lady as well as Secretary of State.  While she was not great at either, she still has the closest idea of how the country is run.  That and, like Jeb Bush, she has the bonus of having the support of someone who has done this before.  Bill Clinton will obviously help Hillary out and that could be seen as a reason to vote for her.

Hillary Clinton is an extremely gifted politician, probably the best in the race.  But she seems too untrustworthy to elect.  There is a reason people feel unsure about her.  It’s that gut feeling kicking in and we should listen to it.  That, and like Cruz, there is the possibility of a legal issue which no one wants to deal with.

Martin O’Malley– Democrat (The 3rd person on stage at Democratic debates)

I feel like I have to first tell you who this guy is considering his abysmal poll numbers.  O’Malley is the former Democratic governor from Maryland who stands to the left of Hillary when they debate on TV.  While at first glance, he may just seem like a special moderator, O’Malley is actually in the debate as well.  And if you listen closely to what he has to say, you’d discover that he says a lot of likeable things.  When I listen to him speak, I find myself intrigued about what he is trying to do.  He isn’t a rebel like Bernie but he also isn’t completely establishment like Hillary.  Instead, he’s closer to the middle, closer to Hillary, but still far enough away.  Hopefully he performs well in Iowa because I’d like to see him get a real shot at the nomination.  He may be the man we need for the job, we just don’t see it.  A moderate always seems like the way to go, especially in a time where it looks like the 2 bickering parties may legitimately go to war.

The problems are obvious. No one knows who he is. He polls terribly everywhere and when they debate, he is given 4 questions the entire 2 and a half hours the debate runs.  It’s hard for us to learn about someone when they’re not given the chance to present themselves.  However, I partially blame that on him.  When he is called on to speak, he speaks perhaps too calmly and always ends up being interrupted by Clinton or Sanders.  Problem is, he doesn’t assert himself on the debate stage and that does not bode well for the office. Another issue is that he still may be too establishment for most peoples’ taste.

If all remains the same, it’s obvious that Martin O’Malley doesn’t have a powerful enough voice to sit in the oval office.  If he can assert himself, however, he is an extremely interesting candidate going forward.

DONALD TRUMP- Republican (ISIS=fearless / Megyn Kelly=intimidating ???)

Donald Trump is THE scariest candidate we’ve ever seen.  He has the country by the throat and he refuses to let it go.  He effectively jumped on an issue (immigration) that touched the hearts of many Americans and exploited it for the votes.  With a herd of passionate followers, Trump has been compared to the likes of Hitler and, while ridiculous, they’re not all that far off.  Trump despises Muslims, Mexicans, Fox News, CNN, President Obama, etc. the list goes on.  He proposes insane policies that would never in a million years be allowed to be implemented.  His words sound good, I know.  They make us feel like we can be a fighting nation.  But we need to understand that everything Trump says is filler.  He shouts a bunch of nonsense and creates uproar but there is no substance to what he says.  He has yet to tell us how he will get Mexico to build a wall or how he would negotiate with Iran.

With such little information, it is hard to see how he’s grown such a huge lead.  But it’s what he stands for that makes him a viable candidate.  Underneath all of the crap, Trump is a Populist who is speaking from the angry side of America.  And we are an angry nation right now.  We feel betrayed on a lot of what has happened recently.  Other nations view us as weak.  And Donald Trump is the voice that is loud enough to attack those problems.  He is also as far away from the establishment as possible.  The nation hates the establishment right now and them attacking Trump only makes him more powerful.  He’s like the Hulk.  Every time he’s attacked, he just gets stronger and more popular.

The thing is; Trump is a really good politician who also happens to control the media.  They give him attention every time he opens his mouth and don’t understand how he is increasing his lead.  And I know this whole excerpt on Trump seems all over the place but that’s exactly how it will be with Trump as President.  Can you really call yourself a responsible American if you place the United States nuclear arsenal in this man’s hands?  Maybe you can, but for me, I think one bad negotiation with Iran or Russia and it’ll be, “Ah, these Iranians are losers anyway.  Give me the button. Bye-bye losers.  Don’t worry, the Iranian people will still love me after this.  I have great relations with those people.  I’m building a casino there as we speak.”

TED CRUZ- Republican (Noted Canadian)

Ted Cruz is one of the, so-called, anti-establishment candidates.  Maybe that’s because he hates immigrants, maybe it’s because the establishment hates him, or maybe it’s because he was born in CANADA.  I don’t know.  What I do know is that he has some crazy plans for the country.  He basically wants to erase everything that President Obama has done over the past 8 years.  He doesn’t seem to understand the idea of progress and he’s also pushing too hard to be the humorous candidate of the field.  I hate to break it to you Cruz but you’re not funny at all.  So keep sending links to videos and I’ll continue to get more upset.  Also, the guy was born in Canada.  Look, I get that he’d most likely be fine if a legal issue was brought up but do you really want to risk that?  Giving the election away because of a lawsuit would be a horrible way to lose.  Maybe it’s best that he just endorse someone and try again when there aren’t exploiters in the field.

That being said, Cruz does have some intrigue to him.  He’s different and maybe that’s what the country needs.  He’s similar to Marco Rubio in a lot of areas except for the fact that Rubio isn’t as much of an extremist conservative.  Cruz is tough and an incredible debater.  That would suit him well in the White House.  Relations are a huge concern and with a man as persuasive as Cruz, who knows what could happen.

While his debating skills and tough demeanor are incredible assets, I feel Cruz would be better suited as a Secretary of State.

MARCO RUBIO- Republican (Serious with a side of Cuban)

Marco Rubio is a lot like Ted Cruz except for the Canadian part.  They both come from immigrant parents, they both hate immigrants and they both say they’re anti-establishment even though they’re US Senators.  They also both want to erase the last 8 years of Obama.  Within 30 days of office, Rubio plans on getting rid of everything Obama did.  His hatred for the administration is incredibly strong.  What I don’t get is why he’s so completely serious all the time.  He talks as if it is completely urgent that he get elected.  Like if we don’t pick him the US is going to blow up because of Obamacare.  He needs to focus more on reaching us and less on pleading for our vote.  He comes across as desperate.  Finally, the amount of times he’s missed votes in the Senate is just kind of weird.  Is he responsible enough to lead the country?

But still, Rubio is a solid candidate.  He’s not an extremist like Cruz.  He has also worked with Democrats before.  Sure, he flip-flopped but sometimes being able to compromise or change your opinion is a good thing.  That is the most important quality of a president; getting the parties to work together.  It is Obama’s number 1 failure and he would admit it.  That and Rubio dislikes the current immigration policy and he comes from immigrants.  That is a good sign to me.  It shows that if he’s not even going to be biased towards something that personifies him, maybe he won’t be able to be bought by corporations and lobbyists.

JEB BUSH- Republican (Avoiding his last name like it’s the plague)

JEB! He was doomed from the start and it’s not even his fault.  Jeb has the unfortunate pleasure of being related to two former presidents who got themselves into some hot water over in the Middle East.  Both dad and W. embroiled themselves in wars which were public disasters.  The public forgave dad but they cannot find it within them to forgive W.  With that hate for the Bush family still ever present, Jeb has found it extremely hard to get any traction.  But he can blame himself some bit also.  He picked a fight with a man who was far more prepared for it than he was.  Trump demolished Jeb within weeks and sent him crashing down the polls.  And the thing is, Jeb kind of rolled over and took it.  Like O’Malley, there is no fight in this guy and it makes him look incredibly weak.  He is being viewed as the weakest of the Bush boys and his brother was a cheerleader.

Regardless of all the negatives surrounding Jeb, good can still be found.  For one, he has incredibly rich backers which is allowing him to stay afloat long enough.  What will help him is surviving past the preliminary caucuses when candidates begin to drop.  After that, Jeb can assert himself.  And he should because, although he is the epitome of establishment, he brings a moderate approach to the Republican Party that can’t really be seen anywhere else.  Let’s not forget all of the help he can get from the family.  And while you may not like it, only 5 men know what it is like to run this country and 2 of them are in Jeb’s family.

If he can get over the fear of his last name as well as get from underneath Donald Trump’s boot, Jeb! could be looking at an interesting campaign.

CHRIS CHRISTIE- Republican (Invented the “I Hate Hillary” t-shirt)

Chris Christie is out of shape.  I’m not one to talk but it’s just the tough truth.  There is a certain image the President has to uphold nowadays.  While it shouldn’t deny him votes, it does promote a bad message about America.  That and the fact that he’s a fighter from Jersey are holding him back.  No one likes New Jersey so naturally no one is going to like a candidate from there.  He likes to yell, much like Trump, but it’s not nearly as effective as Trump.  He also tends to attack Hillary Clinton more than actually talk about himself which is hurting his campaign.  Just promote your message man.

That being said, Christie, like Rubio, is one of the candidates poised to make a big push and make things interesting.  He is governor of New Jersey, a blue state, which means he can get votes from Democrats and he can also work with Democrats.  Christie has also been a leader through tragedy and hard times.  During Superstorm Sandy, he guided New Jersey through hardship and then, in its aftermath, brought the state back to life.  His past as a lawyer and attorney general also give him some good perspective on legal issues that confront presidents.  And his tough demeanor will only benefit him in negotiations as long as he withholds from threatening other leaders with baseball bats when he gets upset.  If he lays off of Hillary a little bit, Christie might be able to pull off some major upsets.

BEN CARSON- Republican (Known for voicing Droopy Dog)

Ben Carson was soaring for a while and maybe it was because he’s a brilliant neurosurgeon.  Or maybe it was because he’s black.  Or maybe it was because he didn’t say much while he was soaring.  I agree with the latter because once that man started talking, his numbers dropped incredibly fast.  People began to realize that, though he was brilliant, Carson knew nothing about politics.  And don’t feel bad because it wasn’t just us.  He even tricked his own campaign staff into thinking that he was qualified.  They soon found out just how lost that man truly was.

Carson is anti-establishment but he is also the establishment’s best hope for winning.  His incompetence might just be enough to convince people that they need an establishment candidate if they want to keep the country moving.  He’s not worth the time anymore.

JOHN KASICH- Republican (Goes to gay weddings-Opposes gay weddings ?)

Kasich is the governor from Ohio who is that dark horse candidate we always tend to find ourselves talking about.  Much like Rick Santorum in 2012, Kasich is quietly climbing the polls although he’s not doing much.  He may perform well for a little while but, like Santorum, he will fall off when people see what he’s really like.  Kasich doesn’t really offer much in this race.  He is very run of the mill compared to the other candidates.  I personally love a candidate who is run of the mill because it shows that they’re humbled and non-extremists.  But Kasich neither talks loudly nor carries a big stick so he can’t be seriously considered in my opinion.  He would definitely make a very reliable Vice President though and he tends to remind me a lot of Joe Biden in his demeanor.

 WRAP-UP

I hope this has been helpful.  These are what I believe the pros and cons of the candidates are.  I tried to be fair and show the good and bad of each.  Some had more than others but in the end I think it’s enough to get the point across.  All of the candidates have their pros and cons.  You need to pick which one you can live with and then go out and vote for them.  If you don’t know who to pick, that’s okay too.  There’s still plenty of time.  The most important thing is that you choose who you want and not who the media or anyone else told you to choose.  I don’t even know who my candidate is yet and I also just made it worse by writing all of this.  Good luck.

[1] http://www.tradingeconomics.com/united-states/gdp

[2] http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/debt/current

[3] https://www.americanpressinstitute.org/publications/reports/survey-research/millennials-news/