Tag: Racism

Stop with the Fake Trump “Facts”/Memes

Stop with the Fake Trump “Facts”/Memes

Understanding Donald Trump Supporters

Happy Super Tuesday everybody.

Over the past several months, we’ve witnessed as time and time again, Donald Trump says whatever he wants and his lead isn’t affected.  Better yet, he manages to somehow grow an even larger lead after he is publicly attacked by the media, social media and the rest of the country.  He’s called Mexicans “rapists”, called for a ban on Muslims and even attempted to seem a little confused on who David Duke is (Former Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan).  And each and every time, he is called out for it by the media in the harshest of ways.  When we see this media backlash, we, as millennials, rush to our Twitter and Facebook accounts hoping to share the memes that are sure to be made about how bad Trump is.  And, I’ve got to be honest; we do a really good job of humiliating this man.  In the comments section, there isn’t much support found for Trump as it is mostly people doubling down on their hatred for the bigot.  Then, we wait.  We wait for the seemingly inevitable drop in his support.  But instead, as he has proven countless times in this election season, he is unfazed by the attacks.  Rather than his downfall, we get breaking news from CNN that his lead has grown an extra 2 or 3 points.

And the big question that no one seems to be able to understand is… HOW?

Since no one seems to know how, I’ll take a crack at it.  The simplest explanation I can come up with is this; Trump supporters do not give a crap about all of the bad things the media or anyone making up memes in their dorm room has to say about him.  Trump, regardless of what the media might tell you, is an extremely gifted politician.  Early on in this race, from his very first interview where he labeled Mexicans as “rapists and criminals” he was pandering towards a very specific group of people.  That group is the Silent Majority.  This is a large number of people in the U.S., particularly the white, evangelistic voters of the southern states.  Everything that Trump has done has basically been done for them, in my opinion.

Trump’s entire platform revolves around this idea of “Make America Great Again”.  For the Silent Majority, anything else he says is basically filler.  They hear this message and are immediately flooded with memories of a U.S. pre-Obama.  And while we may not see that America as “great”; they do and that’s all that matters.  They’re reminded of the times when America didn’t act on social issues quickly, when Presidents spoke their mind and didn’t give in to political correctness and when America wasn’t trailing China in certain economic categories.  Now, not all of this is because of Obama but a lot of these concerns have been raised under his administration.  For the Silent Majority, Trump is someone who understands their ideals and wants to bring them out of the shadows and back into the foreground.  Under President Obama, the Silent Majority was widely ignored as Obama dealt with other issues.  This group wasn’t a priority to him and it’s showing in this election season.  They are out in force to find their perfect candidate.  And Trump is feeding them all of the attention that they want and they are eating it up and backing him with unheard of loyalty.

As far as the media and memes are concerned, there’s an explanation for that as well.  The Silent Majority is a group that has been ridiculed and bashed by the media in recent years (8 or so).  So everything that the media puts on Trump is another way of trying to put them down and, instead of losing him support, it actually inspires his supporters even more to fight back against the establishment.  And his supporters are typically older white men and women so either they don’t see the memes made by millennials or they just don’t care about our opinion since they dislike us as much as the media.  They think that we’re making America weak with our political correctness, Starbucks and participation trophies.

Donald Trump is more than likely going to be the nominee at this point in the race.  He doesn’t just have the Silent Majority’s votes either.  If you don’t want to see him in the White House in 2017, here are a couple things to consider:

1.)    Mass Media/GOP Establishment: Stop posting attacks and rumors about Trump

–          Every time you attack Trump you give him a reason to sidetrack.  He gets as much time as he wants to address the attack and avoid talking about actual issues.  I don’t think he’s talked about a single issue since he announced he was running for President.  Get him to talk about issues so we can see how informed he actually is.  Enough with the 24/7 airtime too.

2.)    Social Media: Stop harassing Trump supporters with hate-filled memes and comments

–          Every time you attack his supporters for their “low intelligence” or “racism” you fuel them even more.  You give them the motivation to go out there and convert people to the Trump Train.  And let’s be real, you’re not doing much to swing votes to your candidate. (And no, sharing memes about Bernie Sanders isn’t enough)

 

We can only blame ourselves if Donald Trump is elected President in November.

History is Repeating Itself

History is Repeating Itself

Young America is Mimicking (albeit less radically) the Actions of Young America circa Vietnam

Being a history major in college allowed me to track all of the times in which history repeated itself.  You find that it doesn’t matter how educated the man or group was; they always blindly fell down the same path as their predecessors.  Take Napoleon and Hitler’s marches into Russia as an example.[1][2]

America is as guilty of these instances as any other nation.  Today, I find us increasingly in danger of falling into a similar cycle that we have already experienced.  And it is my age group that is a part of this and also will be the group that feels its effects.  We are following the blueprint of young Americans during the late ‘60s and ‘70s.  The situations are eerily similar.  And while the ‘60s and ‘70s are widely considered decades of great social justices, they are also seen as some of the most tumultuous times this nation has ever seen in regards to racial issues and government disapproval.  We are becoming just as disillusioned with our current situation as young Americans were during ‘Nam.

War and Government that no one wants:

Back in the ‘60s, the youth was disillusioned with the Vietnam War.  They protested the United States’ involvement and accused soldiers of the genocide of young, innocent Vietnamese people.  Some protests turned deadly (Kent State) and caused the people to feel even more disconnect with their government.  When things calmed down a little, they were struck with more reason to resent the government when President Nixon’s Watergate scandal came to light.  It also did not help the cause when Ford pardoned Nixon of any wrongdoing.[3]  They were living in an era of complete governmental and military turmoil.

Today, we find ourselves in a uniquely similar position.  Much of the public is through with the Middle East.  Iraq, Syria, Libya and Afghanistan have drained us of all our fighting spirit.  We continually fight for something that we do not understand or believe in.  Our method of protesting is through social media with memes and long posts where we rip the government and all of the “Hawks” inside of it a new one (even if we have no relevant information or sources).  And anyone who tries to argue with us gets a full taste of our anger through multiple comments, videos, Jordan meme faces, etc.  We’ve also had to deal with a rash of scandals including General Petraeus and the on-going Hillary Clinton spectacle.  Because of this, we have either backed away from the government completely or latched ourselves on to people who we believe oppose D.C. (Sanders and Trump).

Social Issues Galore:

During the Vietnam War, the Supreme Court was extremely active.  Every social issue of the time was up for grabs; Free Speech, Privacy Issues, Criminal Rights, etc.  Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) was a case that involved the rights of students to protest the war. They wore black arm bands to voice their disapproval.[4]  Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) dealt with privacy.  There were also a slew of cases that fought for the rights of the accused.  These included Miranda v. Arizona (1966), Mapp v. Ohio (1960) and Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) which dealt with issues like self-incrimination, illegally obtained evidence and the right to counsel.[5]  Finally, there was the issue in Roe v. Wade (1973) which gave women the right to get an abortion.  Regardless of the issues, the era was filled with rapidly changing social issues which the youth responded to.  They were in favor of such decisions such as Roe V. Wade but very much disapproved of the way in which issues like homosexuality (Stonewall Riots) were handled.[6]  The point is that this era of young Americans was hit with an absurd amount of change in a short amount of time.[7]

The same can be said for today’s youth.  We’ve had to endure crucial social issues that include health, gay marriage and immigration in a short span of time.  For some, our bleeding support can clearly be seen in cases such as Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) which guaranteed same-sex marriage under the Constitution.[8]  Somewhat related to that is the way in which Transgender people are beginning to fight for their rights and the legion of support they are receiving from the youth.[9]  Another issue which has been lauded by the youth is the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) which gives all Americans, regardless of income, the right to affordable health care.[10]  Both of these issues received strong support from people my age because it is the belief of this generation that same-sex marriage and health care are both obvious rights of the people.  We also show our disapproval with the outcomes of certain immigration issues.  The majority of this generation believes that immigration and amnesty should be protected based on the belief that we are a country of immigrants.  Also, our past history of how we became America (being welcomed by the Native Americans) should influence how we act as a nation towards new immigrants.  That is why many were angered with the decision in Arizona v. United States (2012).  While striking down 3 of the immigration laws passed by the Arizona legislature, the Supreme Court still upheld the law that allowed law enforcement to request legal status papers from anyone.  People felt that this was a grossly discriminatory law that allowed police to unconstitutionally harass anyone they wanted to.[11]  Regardless, this is just the tip of the iceberg of the social issues faced with both generations.  The amount that has been thrown at us and our Vietnam era predecessors is absurd however.  We have had to respond to a variety of different, impactful issues at a young age.

The “Racism is Over” Issue:

When the Civil Rights Act was signed into law, many people believed that racism was finally over and that things could finally get started.  Martin Luther King Jr. himself called it nothing short of a, “second emancipation”.[12] However, they failed to realize that signing a paper didn’t turn racists into non-racists.  All over the country, young black men and women were still being oppressed by radical white supremacists.  This led to the Black Panther Party which looked to protect African-Americans as well as keep the fight for their rights alive.  However, this also led some black people to become distant and believe that all white people were racists.  While it was a milestone in race relations, the Civil Rights Act can be seen as a cause for the continued divide between the races.

When President Barack Obama was sworn into office in 2009, people finally believed that racism was over.  The country (still a white majority) managed to elect a young, black senator from Illinois to the highest position in the land.  Once again, it led people to feel that racism had been solved and we were all going to live united.  However, swearing a black man into the Oval Office did not cure people of their racist tendencies like we believed it did.  Still, young black men and women are oppressed daily.  White people tend to turn to the fact that the President is black to defend their position.  And they’re partially right; we have come a long, long way with our race relations but we’re not close to being done. (F.Y.I. arguing that, “Nothing has changed”, makes you look unintelligent, oblivious of obvious history and causes MLK to roll over in his grave, so stop it)  Just because the President is black doesn’t mean all black people are safe from racial oppression; just he is because of his status. (And he’s a target occasionally too)  With our super-sensitive society today, many people tend to over-react at some issues.  The Black Lives Matter movement was formed to bring light to racial discrimination, particularly with law enforcement.  This has caused a major divide between the races.

Our naïve belief that 2 events “solved racism” has caused whites and blacks to remain bitter and cautious towards each other.

Pentagon Papers v. Edward Snowden:

In 1967, Daniel Ellsberg leaked hundreds of secret Vietnam War documents to the New York Times and Washington Post.  The documents were extremely controversial and made the military’s actions in Vietnam open for public view.  The instance severely discredited the military and US government in the eyes of the public, especially the younger citizens.  To them, this was yet another attempt by the government to withhold information from them and to operate behind closed doors despite their claims of transparency.  The leak caused an uproar about how the issue should be handled and what, if anything, should happen to Ellsberg.  The youth rallied around him because they believed what he did was patriotic.[13]

In 2013, Edward Snowden leaked thousands of documents to “The Guardian” regarding the espionage tactics and targets of the US, Canada, Australia and UK.  The leak extremely weakened the US’ credibility and reputation among world leaders.  It also allowed other nations, particularly China and Russia, to have a first-hand look into the US’ cyber methods.  The leak caused Snowden to flee the US in fear of being convicted of treason.  Even though he weakened the US’ defenses, Snowden is still widely viewed as a hero and patriot for lifting the curtain from the secret world of the US government.[14]

1976 Presidential Election v. 2016 Presidential Election:

In 1976, incumbent (although never elected) Gerald Ford was up against Georgia governor Jimmy Carter for President of the United States.  Following Watergate, Vietnam and other damaging issues, the Ford Administration was under extreme scrutiny.  His approval was so bad, in fact, that he faced stiff competition in the Republican Primaries; this is very unusual for incumbents (he narrowly beat out Ronald Reagan).  The people were fed up with the lies and betrayal of the government and wanted to elect someone who was considered an outsider (sound familiar?).  Jimmy Carter was an unknown governor from Georgia who rose quickly because of his “outsider” status.  He ran on the promise that he would stray away from typical D.C. politics and be more for the people.  According to CBS interviews in 1976, Carter secured more of the youth vote.  This can be attributed to the idea that Carter wasn’t an establishment candidate and Ford was a part of the Nixon Administration during Watergate.  There was no trust in Ford, especially after he pardoned Nixon for his actions involving Watergate.  It rubbed people the wrong way and Carter narrowly defeated Ford in November for the presidency.[15]

Today, we find ourselves in the midst of a similar situation.  President Obama’s time is nearly up and, across all parties, the message is clear; elect someone outside of D.C.  This election season has seen plenty of “outsider” candidates ranging from Carly Fiorina to Ben Carson.  However, the two that have stuck are Republican Fear Monger Donald Trump and Democratic Socialist Bernie Sanders.  Both couldn’t be farther apart on their issues but they both bring the same outsider presence that young voters (and voters in general) are looking for.  Young people love Bernie Sanders because he is igniting a political revolution which intends to bring down corruption in Wall Street and D.C.[16]  Young people love Donald Trump because he speaks his mind and tells it how it is.  He doesn’t “softball” any of his comments and isn’t afraid to offend someone which people view as genuine.[17]

Summary:

We have repeated many of the same things that Americans, in general, did during the ‘60s and ‘70s.  We have not been as radical as they were back then but the blueprint is pretty similar.  It’s scary because, even with all of this knowledge of that period, we seem to be playing it by the book.  It’s good for us to be passionate about certain things but we also need to be mindful of our history so we don’t keep repeating the ‘60s and ‘70s, which were some of the most tumultuous times this nation has ever seen.

And we need to slow down and take a real good look at the nation we are forming.  Every day that someone our age, regardless of race, is on social media slamming a Beyoncé performance being anti-cop or blaming all white people for a cop killing a young black man, we divide ourselves even further.  We need to start taking responsibility for our actions on Twitter and Facebook and find a way to unite our nation rather than divide it.  So no more stupid posts about how the Confederate Flag, “has special heritage within the south”; that flag is racist.  Make the sacrifice for the good of the nation you claim to love so much and get rid of it.  And no more stupid videos of young black people in “white face” mimicking white frat guys.  Yeah, they’re tools but by doing that, you’re showing you’re no better than white racists.  And not white racists today; extremely white racists at the turn of the century who believed Eugenics was the future of the world.  Think about it.  It’s posts like these two that drive up 100k comments and shares of pure hate and division.  We’re better than this.

[1] http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/defeat/attack-russia.htm

[2] http://www.history.com/news/napoleons-disastrous-invasion-of-russia-200-years-ago

[3] http://www.historyplace.com/speeches/ford.htm

[4] http://www.firstamendmentschools.org/freedoms/case.aspx?id=404

[5] http://www.civilrights.org/judiciary/supreme-court/key-cases.html

[6] http://www.civilrights.org/archives/2009/06/449-stonewall.html

[7] http://www.ushistory.org/us/57d.asp

[8] https://www.oyez.org/cases/2014/14-556

[9] http://news.wgcu.org/post/internet-helps-transgender-youth-come-out

[10] http://obamacarefacts.com/obamacare-facts/

[11] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/25/arizona-immigration-law-ruling_n_1614067.html

[12] http://www.history.com/topics/black-history/civil-rights-act

[13] http://www.history.com/topics/vietnam-war/pentagon-papers

[14] http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jun/14/edward-snowden-hero-government-scare-tactics

[15] http://www.gallup.com/poll/9460/election-polls-vote-groups-19761980.aspx

[16] http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/09/why-young-people-like-bernie-sanders/

[17] https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/12/12/the-four-basic-reasons-that-explain-why-donald-trump-actually-is-so-popular/

 

#OscarsSoWhite: A Tough Analysis of Hollywood

#OscarsSoWhite: A Tough Analysis of Hollywood

Racism or Favoritism: A Short History of Oscar Nominees

The recent controversy over the 88th Academy Awards can be traced back to last year when, like this year, no black person was nominated for an Oscar.  That led social media to blow up and people my age to express their anger over the “Whiteness” of Hollywood and their “racist” tendencies.  While at face value, this can be viewed as true, people should understand exactly what they’re convicting Hollywood of.  You’re essentially calling the most Liberal, Progressive and forward-thinking entertainment industry (or any industry, to be honest) of being racist, white supremacists who want to “keep the black man down”.  Hollywood tends to be where some of the more extreme liberals come from; people who will stop at nothing to see equality reached and the environment thoroughly protected.  So what I have come to realize is that the blow back from the nomination announcements comes from my generation once again failing to look beyond social media to find answers.  We need to stop relying on the information of a tweeter to mold how we’re going to see a certain issue.  If you’re going to criticize something, at least do some research beforehand.

History is the one class people my age slept through during school.  Even with that being true, many people on social media tend to use history as their supporting evidence.  However, it is usually misguided or wrong information.  The Academy Awards is not an event where white people gather to praise their achievements in cinema.  It’s where accomplished and amazing talent comes to revel in the combined work of the past year.  The Academy has been around since 1927.[1]  Naturally, there weren’t any people of color nominated for anything that year.  That was just how the times were back then and we need to come to terms with that part of history.  Racism was an enormous problem and the fact that people of color could be equal to white people was unheard of.

However, as time progressed, more and more people of color and minorities for that matter were recognized for their talent at the Oscars.  All it takes to know this is going to the Oscars website and looking up the history on your own. (http://awardsdatabase.oscars.org/)  With this information, you’ll see names like Jose Ferrer, Miyoshi Umeki, Sidney Poitier, Rita Moreno, Jamie Foxx, Morgan Freeman, etc.  Since 2000, there have been 11 winners of color in “best actor” categories.  That’s not to mention the other nominations they have received in that same time period.  In 2004, Jamie Foxx beat out his competitors, who included Don Cheadle, to win the “Best Actor” Oscar for his performance in “Ray”.  He was then narrowly defeated by Morgan Freeman for the “Best Supporting Actor” Oscar for his performance in another film.[2]

So while I don’t think the Academy has a racism problem, I do think they have a favoritism problem they need to realize.  The voters become fixated on certain actors in every generation and will continuously throw their support behind them.  And it’s not to say that these actors aren’t great, it’s just that they may benefit from holding a much stronger resume than other actors.  Taking a look at the Oscars history, (which, again, I strongly urge you to do) you’d find the same names, regardless of race, repeated frequently over a period of years.  In the 1940s and 50s, it was rare to see a nomination list without Bogart, Hepburn or Brando.  Similarly, in the 60s, 70s and 80s, the lists would normally contain Hoffman, Poitier, DeNiro and Streep.  In the early 2000s, not seeing Bardem, Smith, Washington, Depp and Dench was a rarity.

Nowadays, the Academy is obsessed with actors like DiCaprio, Ruffalo, Redmayne, Bale, Amy Adams and Streep (again).  They will give their films a closer look because they are fans of their work.  The problem is; they’re all white and that tends to rub people the wrong way.  And you can’t stop them from being bias; it’s in their nature to be.  You might be a huge fan of Michael B. Jordan and that’s why you believe he should have been nominated; this is the same way the voters feel towards their choices.  They’re fans of them and subsequently tend to enjoy their films more than other films.  So like I said at the top, there isn’t a racism problem, there is a favoritism problem that the Academy needs to admit to.

But I also believe if these fine actors of color, like Jordan, Elba, Nyong’o, Ejiofor and Henson keep producing at the level that they are; the Academy will fall in love with them.  We could find ourselves looking at a yearly Oscar’s list and saying to ourselves, “These same guys, again?” much like we do with LeBron and the MVP voting in basketball.  But it is irresponsible for us to continue calling something racist and “So White” if we don’t first understand the history of it.  You can’t assume that something is racist just because you weren’t included in it by vote when past votes have proven that you’re included.

As for the Oscars themselves, I do think Elba got snubbed (you could’ve taken out Matt Damon) and Ryan Coogler got snubbed.  But I don’t think Will Smith should have been nominated and there’s no “Best Cast” at the Oscars for NWA’s sake.  You also have to include a movie that broke $2 Billion as a Best Picture nominee just out of show of respect. (Star Wars: The Force Awakens)  Besides that, it’s going to be interesting to see if Leo can finally end his nightmares or if he’ll still be chasing men in Golden body suits for one more year.

[1] http://www.oscars.org/academy-story

[2] http://awardsdatabase.oscars.org/ampas_awards/DisplayMain.jsp?curTime=1454399748791